Please, please do some reading.
There is no benefit going to a lower temperature thermostat, only draw backs. If your engine is overheating, something else is wrong with it. Diagnose the problem and then fix it.
@cajun posted his own data logs that proved my point. If your termostat is cycling you've got cooling capacity to spare.
The combustion process is more efficient at elevated engine temperatures.
Here are some important points that can't be disputed:
The higher the temperature delta, the more energy that is transferred from high to low. The lower the temperature delta, the less energy that is transferred from high to low. In a properly maintained cooling system at full operating pressure, the boiling point of the coolant is in the 260F area. That gives you a working range of 60F with a 200F thermostat. At 200F the radiator will transfer more heat energy to ambient than at 180F. At 200F less combustion gases will condense against the engine walls (I wonder what the dew point of the combustion gases is).
I can't stress this enough: If you're overheating, something else is wrong with the engine. Either too much power, or something wrong with the coolant or an air bubble, whatever. Get it out of your head that a fixed temperature matters. It doesn't. What matters, is the coolant boiling or not. As long as the coolant is not boiling, there isn't an issue. Within reason. If you're sitting right at 260F, other fluids might not like being that hot. If your thermostat is cycling and your data logs show that, you have absolutely nothing to worry about. Save the money you waste on a low temp thermostat for when it's time to replace the coolant. That's more important.